Independence revolutions in Latin America during the 19th century

Revolution in Latin America

The regions of Latin America were conquered by the Spanish in the sixteenth century. The Portuguese and the French also had their presence there. The political power of the South American cultures such as the Incas and the Aztecs was destroyed by these colonial powers.

The colonisers (conquistadores) brought to an end the local religious beliefs and introduced the Catholic religion. The colonial rule in Latin America was brutal and was marked by widespread genocide and decimation of the indigenous population.

The native people were made to work as slave labourers in the farmlands as well as the mines of the colonial masters who exported goods such as sugar, coffee, gold, and silver to European nations. Latin America today consists of many nations such as Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Chile, Venezuela, and Caribbean countries in Central and South America.

The Haitian Revolution

Haiti, earlier known as Saint-Domingue(as the French called their colony) was the richest French colony (1659–1804) in the Caribbean Sea. Its plantations produced more sugar than all of Europe’s other Caribbean and American colonies put together.

The island’s indigenous population, forced to mine for gold, was devastated by European diseases and brutal working conditions, and by the end of the sixteenth century it had virtually vanished. Landowners in western Hispaniola imported increasing numbers of African slaves.

By 1789, the estimated 556,000 population of Saint-Domingue included 500,000 African slaves, 32,000 European colonists (whites), and 24,000 free affranchis or mulattoes (black people of mixed African and European descent).

News of the storming of the Bastille was followed by armed defiance of the royal governor. Vincent Ogé, a mulatto, who had lobbied with the Parisian assembly for colonial reforms, led an uprising in late 1790 but was captured and executed.

In May 1791 the French revolutionary government granted citizenship to the wealthier mulattoes who had even owned slaves. But Haiti’sEuropean populationdisregarded the law. Within two monthsisolated fi ghting brokeout between European whites and mulattoes.

All of them expected the black slaves to continue working, suffering and dying as if nothing had changed. But they took them by surprise when in August thousands of slaves rose in rebellion.

The European whites attempted to appease the mulattoes to quell the slave revolt. The French National Assembly granted citizenship to all mulattoes in April 1792. The country was torn by rival factions, some of which were playing into the hands of Spanish colonists in Santo Domingo or of British troops from Jamaica.

In 1793, a commissioner, LégerFélicité Sonthonax, was sent from France to maintain order. He offered freedom to slaveswho joined his army. He soon abolished slaveryaltogether, a decision ratified subsequently by the French government.

In the late 1790s, Toussaint L’Ouverture, a military leader and former slave, gained control of several areas. Napoleon sent a fleet of 12,000 troops to seize control ofSaint-Domingue fromToussaint L’Ouverture’sforces. The war which followed was prolonged and bloody. At one point the French army seemed to have won after Toussaint was misled into believing in the possibility of conciliating with the enemy.

But he was kidnapped and killed. His former lieutenant Dessalines rose to the occasion and organised black resistance. He defeated Napoleon’s army. Saint-Domingue became the independent black state of Haiti in 1804.

Venezuela and New Granada (now Colombia)

Inspired by The Haitian Revolution, slavesin Venezuela rose in rebellion in the 1790s.Creoles (persons of mixed European and black descent) wanted an expansion of the free trade that was benefiting their plantation economy. At the same time, however, they feared that the removal of Spanish control might bring about a revolution that would destroy their own power.

Therefore, they formed the strong loyalist faction in the Viceroyalty of New Granada. In 1808 Napoleon had made his brother Joseph the king of Spain after the abdication of the weak king Charles IV in favour of his son Ferdinand. Napoleon had them both imprisoned.

With Charles and Ferdinand removed from the scene, the Empire was without a stable government for six years. The political crisis in Spain provided the opportunity for the assertion of its colonies. Soon the rebels, as patriots, organised revolutionary governments that introduced some social and economic reforms in 1810.

In Venezuela, the patriots led by Simón Bolívar openly declared a break with Spain the following year. The earthquake that wreaked particular destruction in patriot-held areas in 1812 provided the pretext for loyalist forces to crush the patriots’ army, and drive Bolívar and others to seek refuge in New Granada (the heart of the viceroyalty).

Bolívar soon returned to Venezuela with a new army in 1813 and waged a campaign with the army’s motto, “Guerra a muerte” (“War to the death”). The army led by loyalist José Tomás Boves again succeeded in driving Bolívar out of his home country. By 1815, independence movements in Venezuela and almost all across Spanish South America seemed dead.

A large military expedition sent by Ferdinand VII in that year re-conquered Venezuela and most of New Granada. Yet another invasion led byBolívar in 1816 failed. The following year (1817) a larger and revitalised independence movement emerged, winning the struggle in the north and taking it into the Andean highlands.

Bolivar emerged as a strong military and political force after the struggles. At this point, a group of llaneros (cowboys) of mixed ethnicity led by José Antonio Páez joined the struggle and contributed decisively to the patriots’ military victories in1818–19. After leading his army up the face of the eastern Andes, Bolívar dealt a crushing defeat to his enemies in the Battle of Boyaca.

Consolidating victory in the north proved difficult. A congress that Bolívar convened in Angostura in 1819 named Bolívar as president of Gran Colombia, a union of what are today Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, and Ecuador.

But the sharp divisions prevailing in the region ultimately dashed Bolívar’s hopes of uniting the former Spanish colonies into a single new nation as the United States of Latin America. Furthermore, loyalist supporters still held much of Venezuela, parts of the ColombianAndes, and all of Ecuador. Conditions became favourable in 1820; troops waiting in Cádiz to be sent as part of the crown’s military campaigns revolted.

Eventually New Granada and Venezuela were liberated in 1821. A congress held that year in Cúcuta, a Colombian city, chose Bolívar president of a now much more centralised Gran Colombia.

Simon Bolivar: Bolivar belonged to an oldaristocratic Creole family in Caracas. He wasof fundamental importance to the movementas an ideologue and military leader. In hismost famous “Jamaica Letter” (writtenduring one of his periods of exile, 1815),Bolívar affirmed his undying faith in thecause of independence, even in the face of thepatriots’ repeated defeats.

While critiquingSpanish colonialism, Bolívar held the viewthat the only path for the former colonieswas the establishment of an autonomous andcentralised republican government. The typeof republic that he eventually espoused wasvery much an oligarchic one.

He believedthat a virtuous governing system wouldnot be possible if the nation was divided byethnicity. Bolivar was an inspiring figure toleft-wing and emancipatory movements inLatin America even in the latter half of thetwentieth century.

Mexican Revolution

The independence of Mexico came late. Mexico had a powerful segment of Creoles and Peninsulars, who were the colonial masters born in Spain or Portugal. For many of the powerful in Mexican society, a break with Spain meant a loss of traditional status and power.

Between 1808 and 1810, Peninsulars had acted aggressively to preserve Spain’s power in the region. Rejecting the notion of a congress that would address the question of governance in the absence of the Spanish king, leading Peninsulars in Mexico City deposed the viceroy and persecuted Creoles.

They then welcomed weaker viceroys whom they knew they could dominate. Peninsulars’ efforts could not, however, prevent the emergence of an independence struggle. The revolution in Mexico was led by a Catholic priest, Miguel Hidalgo.

He supported the poor people of Mexico and sympathised with the poor living conditions of Native Americans. His emotional speeches at the Church of Dolores called for an independent Mexico. He led a revolutionary army consisting of Mestizos against the army of Spain and Creoles.

However, he was defeated and killed in 1811. Later, the movement was led by José María Morelos, who declared independence from Spain in 1813. Hewas also defeated in 1815.

Mexican Revolution: The independence of Mexico came late. Mexico had a powerful segment of Creoles and Peninsulars, who were the colonial masters born in Spain or Portugal. For many of the powerful in Mexican society, a break with Spain meant a loss of traditional status and power.

Between 1808and 1810, Peninsulars had acted to preserve Spain’s power in the region aggressively. Rejecting the notion of a congress that would address the question of governance in the absence of the Spanish king, leading Peninsulars in Mexico City deposed the viceroy and persecuted Creoles.

They then welcomed weaker viceroys whom they knew they could dominate. Peninsulars’ efforts could not, however, prevent the emergence of an independence struggle. The revolution in Mexico was led by a Catholic priest, Miguel Hidalgo.

He supported the poor people of Mexico and sympathised with the poor living conditions of Native Americans. His emotional speeches at the Church of Dolores called for an independent Mexico. He led a revolutionary army consisting of Mestizos.

The Creoles, or the wealthy merchants, were watching the developments in Spain where a movement to overthrow the monarchy and to make a new constitution was afoot.

Thinking that this might reduce the power of the Creoles, they declared independence in 1821. It is interesting to note that the person who led the movement was the same officer who defeated the army of Maria Morelos. He declared himself as the emperor whose ruthless rule was finally overthrown. In 1824, Mexico declared itself a republic.

Independence of Brazil

Brazil was a colony of Portugal. When Napoleon invaded Portugal in 1808, thePortuguese emperorDam Joao (John VI), fled to Brazil. He had developed the colony in all aspects by introducing land reforms and establishing military, medical, and art schools.

Even after the defeat of Napoleon, the Portuguese ruler continued to stay in Brazil. But when his power was challenged, he decided to go to Portugal, leaving the colony of Brazil in the hands of his son Dom Pedro. The reliance of the Brazilian upper classes on African slavery favoured their continued ties with Portugal.

Plantation owners depended on the African slave trade, which Portugal controlled. The size of the slave population – approximately half the total of the Brazilian population in 1800 – also meant that Creoles shied away from political initiatives that might mean a loss of control over their social inferiors.

Therefore, the Portuguese authorities at home put an end to the reforms undertaken by Joaoin Brazil. They wanted Dom Pedro to return to Portugal. However, Pedro declared Brazil’sindependence and decided to stay on. In 1822, Brazil obtained independence from Portugal, and it became the only constitutional monarchy in South America, with Pedro I becoming its first emperor.

Other Revolts

The liberator of Argentina, San Martín, joined the Chilean liberator Bernardo O’Higgins, and both were able to get independence for Chile in 1818, followed by Peru in 1820. Bolivar and SanMartin met at the port in Ecuador, Guayaquil,to discuss the future course of action in Latin America and for a probable unification.

While San Martin wanted a European form of government with a constitutional monarchy in the colonies, Bolivar wanted a republican form of government. Though they could not reach any agreement, San Martin retired and allowed Bolivar to take full command. Bolivar could get independence for all South American colonies by 1826.

After the independence of all the colonies, Bolivar tried to unite all Latin American countries under one nation called Gran Colombia. However, the rugged geographical features with mountains and forests, along with power struggles, could not make it a reality.

Though most of the Latin American countries declared themselves as republics and were free from Spanish rule, they were still dependent to a greater extent on foreign powers. While Mexico was invaded by the US and France, inthe course of the nineteenth century, Britain continued to exercise its dominating influence over countries like Argentina and Chile for a long time to come. In each Latin American country, oligarchic cliques ran rival Liberal and Conservative parties and preserved unequal social structure characterised by extreme privilege to great landowners and grinding poverty to the underprivileged.

In the twentieth century, especially after World War II, South America was a troubled continent as the USA sought to control it by pliant dictatorial governments (often referred to as banana republics).

Author: Pravin Babu R

I've done a Master of Engineering in Computer Science and B.Tech in Information Technology . Worked in a private IT company for 5 years. Currently preparing for the Civil Services Exam. My hobby is blogging in different Niches, especially technologies.

* * All the Notes in this blog, are referred from Tamil Nadu State Board Books and Samacheer Kalvi Books. Kindly check with the original Tamil Nadu state board books and Ncert Books.