Rowlatt Act and its impact Ncert Upsc Notes

Passage and Provisions of the Act

  • The Rowlatt Act was passed in 1919, as documented in NCERT-Class-10-History.pdf.
  • It was hurriedly passed through the Imperial Legislative Council despite the united opposition of its Indian members.
  • The Act gave the government enormous powers to repress political activities.
  • It enabled the police to detain political prisoners and anyone else without trial for two years.
  • It curbed fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and strengthened police powers.
  • It effectively curtailed all forms of civil liberties.

Reactions and the Rowlatt Satyagraha

  • Mahatma Gandhi, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, and other leaders felt the government had no right to restrict people’s basic freedoms.
  • They criticised the Act as “devilish” and tyrannical.
  • Emboldened by previous successes, Mahatma Gandhi decided to launch a nationwide satyagraha against the unjust law.
  • Gandhiji called for non-violent civil disobedience, asking Indians to observe 6 April 1919 as a day of “humiliation and prayer,” fasting, and a hartal (strike).
  • Satyagraha Sabhas were set up to launch the movement.
  • He urged Hindus and Muslims to unite in satyagraha, promoted Swadeshi goods as a “religious duty,” and encouraged the boycott of foreign goods, schools, and courts.
  • This became the first all-India struggle against the British government, though it was largely restricted to cities and towns.
  • Across the country, rallies were organised, railway workshop workers went on strike, and shops were closed down.

Government Repression

  • Alarmed by the popular upsurge and scared that communication lines like railways and telegraphs would be disrupted, the British administration decided to clamp down on nationalists.
  • The government used brutal measures to suppress the demonstrations.
  • Local leaders were picked up from Amritsar, and Mahatma Gandhi was barred from entering Delhi.
  • On 10 April, police in Amritsar fired upon a peaceful procession, which provoked widespread attacks on banks, post offices, and railway stations.
  • Martial law was imposed, and General Dyer took command, leading to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre on 13 April as part of the repression.

Aftermath and Withdrawal

  • As news of the Jallianwala Bagh incident spread, crowds took to the streets in many north Indian towns, leading to strikes, clashes with the police, and attacks on government buildings.
  • The government responded with brutal repression to humiliate and terrorise people: satyagrahis were forced to rub their noses on the ground, crawl on the streets, and do salaam (salute) to all sahibs.
  • People were flogged, and villages (such as Gujranwala in Punjab) were bombed.
  • Seeing the spread of violence, Mahatma Gandhi called off the movement and felt the need to launch a more broad-based movement in India.

Referenced Ncert Document

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hees202.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hess208.pdf

https://www.drishtiias.com/images/pdf/NCERT-Class-10-History.pdf

Politics in india since independence Ncert Upsc Notes

Three Core Challenges of Nation-Building

  • Shaping a United Nation: Independent India faced the immediate challenge of forging a united country while accommodating continental size and profound diversity in languages, cultures, and religions. The partition intensified fears about whether India could survive as a unified state without suppressing regional and sub-national identities.
  • Establishing Democracy: The Constitution instituted fundamental rights and universal adult suffrage, establishing representative democracy under a parliamentary system. The ongoing task was developing political practices consistent with constitutional democratic norms.
  • Socio-Economic Development and Equality: The Constitution laid down principles of equality, special protections for socially disadvantaged groups and religious minorities, and welfare objectives in the Directive Principles of State Policy. The administration was tasked with framing effective policies for economic growth and poverty eradication.

Partition: Process, Turmoil, and Consequences

  • The Two-Nation Theory and Division: Advanced by the Muslim League, the two-nation theory claimed India consisted of two distinct peoples—Hindus and Muslims—leading to the creation of Pakistan. Partition followed the principle of religious majorities, but non-contiguous settlements resulted in two separate territories: West and East Pakistan.
  • Dilemmas in Partitioning: Not all Muslim-majority regions favored Pakistan; Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Frontier Gandhi) strongly opposed the division, yet the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) was merged into Pakistan. Punjab and Bengal contained large non-Muslim majority areas, requiring bifurcation down to district or lower levels, which was finalized only after 14–15 August 1947.
  • Violence and Displacement: Partition triggered the abrupt and violent migration of an estimated 80 lakh people across newly drawn borders and caused 5 to 10 lakh deaths. Cities like Lahore, Amritsar, and Kolkata turned into divided “communal zones”. Thousands of women suffered abductions, forced conversions, and forced marriages, while others were killed by kin in the name of “family honour”.
  • Secular Foundation: Despite religious partition, Muslims comprised 10 to 12 percent of India’s population in 1951. Rejecting the two-nation theory, Indian leaders firmly established a secular state where all citizens were granted equal status irrespective of religious faith.
  • Mahatma Gandhi’s Role and Assassination: Gandhi boycotted Independence Day celebrations to quell communal riots in Kolkata and later moved to Delhi, undertaking fasts to establish communal harmony and secure financial dues owed to Pakistan. Opposed by communal extremists, he was assassinated by Nathuram Vinayak Godse during evening prayers on 30 January 1948.

Integration of Princely States

  • Lapse of Paramountcy: The British announced that paramountcy over 565 Princely States would lapse, leaving rulers legally free to join India, join Pakistan, or remain independent. Early declarations of independence by rulers, such as the Maharaja of Travancore and the Nizam of Hyderabad, posed severe threats to India’s territorial unity and democratic prospects.
  • Government Approach and Sardar Patel’s Leadership: Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel negotiated diplomatically and firmly with rulers. The central strategy rested on three factors: recognizing the popular will of state subjects to join the Indian Union, offering flexible regional autonomy, and securing unified national borders. Most rulers signed the “Instrument of Accession” before 15 August 1947.
  • Accession of Junagadh: Resolved after a popular plebiscite confirmed the population’s preference to join the Indian Union.
  • Accession of Hyderabad: The Nizam signed a one-year Standstill Agreement with India in November 1947. As the peasantry in Telangana rose against oppressive rule, the Nizam unleashed an extremist paramilitary force known as the Razakars. The Indian Army intervened in September 1948, forcing the Nizam’s surrender and Hyderabad’s accession to India.
  • Accession of Manipur: Maharaja Bodhachandra Singh signed the Instrument of Accession prior to independence, preserving internal autonomy. Manipur became the first part of India to conduct elections under universal adult franchise in June 1948, transforming into a constitutional monarchy. In September 1949, under pressure from the Indian government, the Maharaja signed a Merger Agreement without consulting the state legislative assembly.

Linguistic Reorganisation of States

  • Commitment to Linguistic Principles: During colonial rule, borders were based on British annexations and administrative convenience, which the national movement rejected. The Congress party adopted linguistic principles for state organisation as early as its 1920 Nagpur session.
  • Post-Independence Hesitation: Following the trauma of Partition, national leaders postponed linguistic reorganization out of fear it would encourage separatism, threaten national unity, and disrupt economic planning.
  • Creation of Andhra State: The Vishalandhra movement demanded Telugu-speaking districts be separated from Madras Province. Following a 56-day fast unto death by veteran Gandhian Potti Sriramulu that resulted in his death in December 1952, widespread protests forced the Central Government to officially create Andhra State in December 1952.
  • States Reorganisation Commission (SRC): Appointed in 1953, the SRC endorsed aligning state boundaries with linguistic divisions. The States Reorganisation Act of 1956 instituted the creation of 14 states and 6 union territories.
  • Long-Term Impact: Accommodating linguistic identities broadened democratic participation beyond the English-speaking elite, strengthened national unity, and institutionalized respect for diversity.
  • Subsequent State Formations:
    • 1960: Bilingual Bombay state was divided into Maharashtra and Gujarat following public agitation.
    • 1963: Nagaland was formed as a separate state.
    • 1966: Punjab was reorganized, carving out Punjabi-speaking Punjab while separating Haryana and Himachal Pradesh.
    • 1972: Major reorganisation in the northeast resulted in Meghalaya being carved out of Assam, alongside statehood for Manipur and Tripura.
    • 1987: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh achieved statehood.
    • 2000: Distinct regional cultures and developmental imbalances led to the creation of Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand.
    • 2014: Telangana was formed as a new state on 2 June 2014.

Gupta empire Upsc Ncert Notes

Origins, Expansion, and Key Rulers

  • Origin and Capital: The Gupta dynasty emerged around the 3rd century CE as regional rulers near present-day Uttar Pradesh. It flourished from the 3rd to the 6th century CE (c. 320–550 CE) with its imperial capital at Pāṭaliputra (present-day Patna).
  • Chandragupta I: The grandfather of Chandragupta II, he played a fundamental role in early territorial expansion and consolidated power through strategic matrimonial and political alliances. He was the first ruler of the dynasty to adopt the grand title maharaj-adhiraja (predecessors were styled simply maha-rajas). A gold coin depicts Chandragupta I alongside his queen, Kumāradevī (of the Lichchhavi gana), with goddess Lakshmi on the reverse.
  • Samudragupta: Succeeded Chandragupta I (reign c. 335–375 CE). His achievements are recorded by court poet Harishena in the Prayāga Praśhasti (Allahabad Pillar Inscription).
    • The praśhasti praises his goal of dharani-bandha (“unifying the Earth”) and characterizes him as a supreme warrior, poet, scholar, and equal to the gods (Kubera, Varuna, Indra, Yama).
    • He maintained four categories of diplomatic policy: uprooted nine rulers of Aryavarta; reinstated and accepted tribute from twelve defeated rulers of Dakshinapatha; received tribute and personal attendance from the inner circle of frontier states (Assam, coastal Bengal, Nepal, gana sanghas); and received submission, tribute, and marriage alliances from outlying rulers (descendants of Kushanas, Shakas, and Sri Lanka).
    • He performed the ashvamedha yajña (commemorated via special gold coins featuring a sacrificial horse and queen holding a fly whisk) and minted coins portraying himself playing the veena.
  • Chandragupta II (Vikramāditya): Son of Samudragupta (reign c. 375–415 CE). He led an expedition into western India, defeating the last of the Shakas. The inscription on the 6-tonne, rust-resistant Iron Pillar of Delhi (Mehrauli) commemorates his victories. His court attracted great minds, poets, and artists.
  • Successors and Decline: Skandagupta (5th century CE) restored the Sudarshana Lake dam after severe storm damage, as recorded on the Junagadh Rock Inscription. The empire faced decline in the 6th century CE due to repeated invasions by the Central Asian Hūṇa tribe and internal conflicts from ascendant regional rulers.

Polity, Administration, and Governance

  • Imperial Ideals and Royal Titles: Rulers elevated themselves above older titles (rājan, mahārāja) by adopting high-sounding titles such as mahārājadhirāja, samrāt, and chakravartin. Royal authority was often conceptualized through divine linkage and extensive geopolitical spheres (chakravarti kshetra).
  • Administrative Structure:
    • Adopted a blend of centralized monarchy and decentralized territorial units.
    • The empire was divided into provinces (bhuktis in northern India), which were subdivided into divisions (vishaya or bhoga). Lower units included districts (adhishthāna or pattana) and groups of villages (vīthis).
    • The village remained the lowest administrative unit.
  • Ministers and Officials:
    • The mantri served as the head of civil administration, supported by the commander-in-chief, the general, and the chief of palace guards.
    • A new “minister of peace and war” (sāndhivigrahika) was introduced.
    • The kumārāmātya emerged as a cadre of high-ranking officials/administrators at local and provincial tiers.
    • Many administrative offices became hereditary (e.g., Harishena served as mahā-daṇḍa-nāyaka or chief judicial officer, kumārāmātya, and sāndhivigrahika).
  • District Council Administration: As documented in the Damodarpur copper plates under Kumaragupta I, district governance involved local consultation with five key figures: the head district officer, chief banker (nagara-shreshthi), chief caravan trader (sārthavāha), chief artisan (prathama-kulika), and chief of revenue collection/scribes (head of kayasthas).
  • Feudal Links and Samantas: Rulers increasingly relied on samantas—military leaders who managed themselves via local landed resources, rendered homage, and supplied troops without drawing fixed cash salaries.
  • Land Grants and Inscriptions: Royal and religious grants were engraved on copper plates (tāmrapatra). Religious land endowments to Brahmanas were designated agrahāras, usually exempt from regular land taxes and provided with administrative immunities.

Economy, Trade, and Society

  • Agrarian Base and Revenue: Land tax remained the principal state revenue; other revenues included fines, irrigation taxes, and levies on mines, crafts, and trade.
  • Trade and Urban Commerce:
    • Vibrant domestic and oceanic trade networks connected India with the Mediterranean, China, and Southeast Asia, exporting textiles, spices, ivory, and gemstones.
    • Socotra Island in the Arabian Sea served as a key transit station containing archaeological traces of Brahmi inscriptions, pottery, and Buddhist stūpa designs left by Indian traders.
  • Coinage: The Gupta rulers minted pure, spectacular gold coins (referred to as dinars) that facilitated large-scale, long-distance commerce. Finds of gold coins tapered off towards the 6th century CE, which historians link either to trade disruption following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire or to increased monetary velocity in market circulation.
  • Social Conditions (Faxian’s Account): Chinese Buddhist pilgrim Faxian (visited early 5th century CE) noted that the populace was prosperous, did not need to register households or attend to harsh magistrates, and that royal land tenants paid a share of harvest. However, social exclusion was strictly enforced: chandālas lived as outcastes outside cities, sounding clappers upon entering settlements to warn others against visual or physical contact.
  • Guilds (Shreṇīs): Guilds of weavers and artisans commanded substantial wealth, legal autonomy, and prestige. The Mandsaur Stone Inscription (473 CE) documents a guild of silk weavers who migrated from Lata (Gujarat) to Dashapura (Madhya Pradesh), engaged in diverse fields (weaving, archery, astrology), and collectively built a magnificent Sun Temple.
  • Status of Women: Elite women held property and political influence. A notable instance is Prabhāvatī Gupta, daughter of Chandragupta II, who became queen-regent of the Vākāṭaka kingdom following her husband’s death, issued administrative copper-plate land charters in her own name (e.g., the Danguna village grant to Acharya Chanalasvamin), and commissioned temples dedicated to Vishnu at Ramagiri.

Culture, Science, Literature, and Art

  • Label of ‘Classical Age’: Sustained peace and economic stability nurtured monumental achievements across fine arts, literature, science, and metallurgy.
  • Astronomy and Mathematics:
    • Āryabhaṭa (c. 500 CE): Lived at Kusumapura (Patna); authored the Sanskrit treatise Aryabhaṭīya. Formulated principles of equation-solving and calculation; posited that the Earth is spherical and rotates on its axis (explaining day and night); accurately calculated the Earth’s circumference and the year length (365 days, 6 hours, 12 minutes, 30 seconds); and provided scientific explanations for solar and lunar eclipses.
    • Varāhamihira: Astronomer, mathematician, and astrologer based in Ujjayinī; authored the encyclopedic work Brihat Samhita, covering astronomy, astrology, weather forecasting, architecture, and agriculture.
  • Medicine: Systematization and compilation of traditional Ayurveda reached maturity during this era through authoritative editions of the Charaka Saṃhitā and Sushruta Saṃhitā.
  • Literature: Sanskrit served as the language of court and elite culture. Foremost among writers was Kālidāsa, who composed renowned poetry and plays, including Meghadūtam, Raghuvamsham, Kumārasambhava, and Abhijnana Shakuntalam. Major Hindu Puranas were also compiled and codified.
  • Art and Architecture:
    • Temple Architecture: Shifted from simple shrines to formal stone and baked-brick temples with a sanctum (garbhagriha) surmounted by a tower (shikhara). Notable examples include the Dashāvatāra temple at Deogarh (Uttar Pradesh), featuring sculptures of Vishnu reclining on Sheshnāg, and the brick temple at Bhitargaon.
    • Sculpture: Emergence of distinct sculpture schools such as Sārnāth (famous for refined stone Buddha images). Terracotta art flourished across northern sites like Ahichchhatra (e.g., life-size river goddesses Ganga on makara and Yamuna on tortoise).
    • Cave Art: Rock-cut architecture and murals thrived with the patronage of the Guptas and allied Vākāṭakas at Ajanta (illustrating Jātaka stories using shading for depth) and the Udayagiri caves in Madhya Pradesh (sculptures of Vaishnava deities and the Varaha avatar).
    • Religious Synthesis: Though the emperors were devotees of Vishnu (Paramabhagavata), royal patronage was open and inclusive, extending support to Shaivism, goddess cults, and Buddhist monastic universities like Nālandā (established in 427 CE).

Home rule movement upsc ncert notes

Leadership and Launch

  • The Home Rule Movement was launched in 1916 by Bal Gangadhar Tilak together with Annie Besant, an Irish philosopher, reformer, and political activist who had become a passionate supporter of Indian self-government.
  • Following his release from prison in 1914, Tilak set himself three specific tasks: reconciling and reuniting the two factions of the Congress, promoting Hindu-Muslim cooperation, and working towards the ideal of home rule.

Core Demands and Objectives

  • The movement called for self-government for India within the British Empire.
  • Unlike the demand for full independence previously voiced by earlier Nationalists, the Home Rule Movement sought a measure of real internal autonomy, which was viewed as a practical first step.

Political Alignment and the Lucknow Pact

  • Tilak succeeded in reuniting the Moderate and Nationalist factions of the Congress at the December 1916 Lucknow session.
  • At the same 1916 Lucknow session, the Congress and the All-India Muslim League signed the historic Lucknow Pact to work together for representative government, with the Congress conceding separate electorates for Muslims in legislative councils.

British Response and Public Attitude

  • The British government was not willing to concede even the demand for internal autonomy within the Empire.
  • In smaller localities across India, ordinary people were often fearful of showing open sympathy towards advocates of home rule due to the strict colonial atmosphere.

Historical Significance

  • The colonial government’s refusal to grant home rule set the stage for the freedom struggle to transition into a new era of nationwide mass political mobilization.

Reference Ncert Document

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/lehs303.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hees202.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hess208.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/lefl105.pdf

Indian contribution to the impact of world war i Upsc Ncert Notes

Military and Manpower Contributions

  • Troop Recruitment from Rural Areas: The colonial government pressured villages across India to supply soldiers for the British war effort, causing widespread rural anger over forced recruitment.
  • Overseas Deployment: Millions of Indian troops were transported on large ships and trains to fight on distant battlefronts abroad in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
  • Global Political Awakening of Soldiers: Many Indian soldiers returned from overseas deployment with direct awareness of how imperialist powers exploited Asian and African peoples, inspiring a strong resolve to challenge and oppose colonial rule at home.

Economic and Industrial Production Contributions

  • Supplying Military Requisites: With British factories preoccupied with war production, Indian industries were called upon to directly manufacture and supply wartime necessities, including jute bags, cloth for army uniforms, military tents, leather boots, and horse and mule saddles.
  • Industrial Expansion and Multi-Shift Operations: To fulfill war orders, existing Indian mills operated multiple shifts, new factories were built, working hours were extended, and large numbers of industrial laborers were hired.
  • Filling the Import Void: A sharp decline in foreign imports (particularly Manchester cotton goods) allowed Indian textile mills and handlooms to take over the domestic market, doubling Indian cotton piece-goods production between 1900 and 1912 and booming further through the war years.
  • Rise of Indian Business Groups: Indian merchants and industrialists reaped substantial profits from wartime supply contracts and market expansion, positioning them to organize business associations (such as the Indian Industrial and Commercial Congress in 1920 and FICCI in 1927) and demand greater opportunities and protective economic policies.

Domestic Sacrifices and Socio-Economic Disruption

  • Financing Colonial War Expenditure: The Government of India’s defence expenditure surged dramatically, which was financed through war loans and an increased fiscal burden on Indians—including higher customs duties and the imposition of taxes on individual incomes and business profits.
  • Severe Inflation: Diverting supplies to the war front resulted in steep price inflation across India, with prices doubling between 1913 and 1918 and creating severe hardship for the general population.
  • Famine and Epidemic Toll: Towards the end of the war period (1918–19 and 1920–21), severe crop failures struck multiple provinces, causing acute food scarcity; combined with the 1918 influenza epidemic, an estimated 12 to 13 million Indians died according to the 1921 Census.

Catalyst for National Political Movements

  • Dismantling British Industrial Dominance: Wartime industrial production permanently weakened Britain’s monopoly; after the war, Manchester was unable to recapture its pre-war dominance in the Indian market, solidifying the economic base of Indian entrepreneurs.
  • Transforming Resistance into a Mass Movement: The unfulfilled hopes of peacetime relief, coupled with wartime exploitation, economic distress, and forced recruitment, unified diverse classes—peasants, industrial workers, educated youth, and businessmen—transforming the anti-colonial movement after 1919 into a nationwide mass struggle under Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership.

Reference Ncert Document

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hees202.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess303.pdf

Impact of World War I on India Upsc Ncert Notes

Fiscal and Economic Burden

  • Escalating Defence Expenditure: The war led to a massive increase in the defence expenditure of the colonial government, which was financed through war loans and higher taxes.
  • New and Increased Taxation: To generate revenue, customs duties were raised and an income tax was introduced across the country.
  • Price Inflation: During the war years, prices surged and doubled between 1913 and 1918, imposing extreme economic hardship on common people.
  • Famine and Epidemic Crises: At the close of the war period (1918–19 and 1920–21), acute food shortages struck many parts of India due to crop failures. This coincided with a devastating influenza epidemic; according to the 1921 census, 12 to 13 million people perished due to famines and the epidemic.

Social Discontent and Rural Coercion

  • Forced Recruitment: The colonial state pressured villages into providing soldiers for the British army. This system of forced recruitment created intense resentment and anger across rural areas.
  • Post-War Disillusionment: Widespread hardship persisted after the war ended, dashing popular expectations of economic and political relief.

Growth and Boom in Domestic Industries

  • Decline of Foreign Imports: Because British factories were preoccupied with producing war supplies for the army, imports of manufactured goods (such as Manchester textiles) into India dropped sharply.
  • Captive Home Market: Indian mills and factories suddenly gained access to a vast, open domestic market to supply without foreign competition.
  • Supplying Military Requirements: As the conflict prolonged, Indian industrial units were tasked with fulfilling war orders, including jute bags, cloth for military uniforms, tents, leather boots, and horse and mule saddles.
  • Expansion of Production: Indian industrial production experienced a boom; new factories were established, existing plants operated multiple shifts, extra workers were hired, and laborers worked longer hours.
  • Rising Business Profits: Indian merchants and industrialists accumulated substantial profits during the war years, establishing economic strength and forming business associations to push for tariff protection and commercial concessions.
  • Permanent Setback to British Manufactures: After the war, British industries (notably Manchester cotton mills) could not recapture their dominant pre-war position in the Indian market, enabling local industrialists to consolidate their hold.

Political Mobilisation and Nationalism

  • Broadening the Nationalist Base: The severe economic strain and unfulfilled wartime expectations helped transform the anti-colonial struggle, drawing in peasants, industrial workers, the urban middle classes, and business groups.
  • Emergence of New Modes of Agitation: Against the backdrop of post-war distress, Mahatma Gandhi launched nationwide mass mobilization—beginning with the Rowlatt Satyagraha in 1919 and culminating in the Non-Cooperation Movement in alliance with the Khilafat cause.

Reference Ncert Document

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess303.pdf

Revolutionary nationalism in india upsc Ncert Notes

Ideological Core and Objectives

  • Revolutionary nationalists rejected the slow pace and “politics of petitions and prayers” of moderate leaders, asserting that British rule could not be overthrown through non-violence alone.
  • They viewed the use of force, mass armed mobilization, and revolutionary violence as legitimate means to overthrow foreign rule, shake the colonial state, and secure complete independence (swaraj).
  • The movement aimed to combat British exploitation, replace monarchical/imperial governance with a democratic republic, and challenge both foreign masters and domestic exploiting classes through a revolution of workers and peasants.

Early Revolutionary Currents and Secret Societies (Late 19th to Early 20th Century)

  • Early Resistance in Maharashtra: Following resentment against harsh plague-control measures in Poona (1896–1897), the three Chapekar brothers assassinated the British Plague Commissioner of Poona and a military officer; they were subsequently captured and hanged.
  • Secret Societies:
    • Anushilan Samiti (1902): Founded in Bengal to provide young men with moral, intellectual, and physical training; coordinated by figures like Barindra Kumar Ghose with the guidance of Aurobindo Ghose.
    • Abhinav Bharat: Established in Maharashtra under V.D. Savarkar, operating alongside secret revolutionary networks.
  • Revolutionary Press: Radical publications emerged, notably the Bengali newspaper Yugantar (run by Barindra Ghose’s group), openly preaching armed revolt and overthrow of the British.

Radicalisation during the Swadeshi Era and Targeted Attacks (1905–1912)

  • Muzaffarpur/Alipore Attempt (1908): Khudiram Bose (aged 18) and Prafulla Chaki threw bombs at a carriage to assassinate Douglas Kingsford, a British judge infamous for handing down severe sentences (floggings and long imprisonments) to Swadeshi activists. Two British women were killed; Chaki shot himself to avoid arrest, while Khudiram Bose was captured and hanged, becoming an iconic national martyr.
  • Alipore Bomb Trial (1908–1909): The colonial administration arrested Aurobindo Ghose, Barindra Ghose, and others. Defended by Chittaranjan Das, Aurobindo was acquitted, whereas Barindra and others received sentences of death or exile to the Andaman Cellular Jail.
  • Targeted Assassinations and Attacks:
    • Ahmedabad (1909): Bombs were thrown at Viceroy Minto’s carriage during a procession (the attempt missed).
    • Nashik (1909): Members of Abhinav Bharat—Anant Kanhere (aged 18), Krishnaji Karve, and Vinayak Deshpande—shot and killed the Nashik District Magistrate; all were subsequently hanged.
    • Tirunelveli (1911): Vanchinathan shot dead a British district collector who had suppressed V.O. Chidambaram Pillai’s Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company.
    • Delhi (1912): As Viceroy Lord Hardinge made his ceremonial entry into the new capital riding an elephant, a bomb was thrown at him; an umbrella bearer was killed and Hardinge was injured.

Transnational and Wartime Insurgency (1914–1918)

  • The Ghadar Movement (1914–1915): Organized by Indian migrants in North America (including Lala Hardayal and Sohan Singh Bhakna), this movement sought to exploit Britain’s preoccupation with World War I to ignite a pan-Indian mutiny within the British Indian Army. Leaders who returned to coordinate it included Rash Behari Bose, Sachin Sanyal, Kartar Singh Sarabha (executed at age 19), and Vishnu Ganesh Pingle.
  • The “German Plot” (1915): Anushilan Samiti leader Jatin Mukherjee (“Bagha Jatin”), collaborating with Rash Behari Bose, organized the reception of German arms and ammunition to trigger an armed uprising. After the plot was discovered by British intelligence, Jatin fought a 75-minute gun battle behind an anthill in the jungles of Balasore (Odisha) and died of his wounds.

The Inter-War Era: HRA and HSRA (1920s–1930s)

  • Hindustan Republican Association (HRA): Founded to pursue armed revolution, its members—including Ram Prasad Bismil, Ashfaqulla Khan, and Chandrashekhar Azad—executed the Kakori Train Robbery (1925) near Lucknow to fund revolutionary operations; this triggered widespread arrests and executions of Bismil and Khan.
  • Formation of HSRA (1928): Reorganized as the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (or Army) at Ferozeshah Kotla in Delhi by Chandrashekhar Azad, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Jatin Das, and Ajoy Ghosh, explicitly wedding armed struggle to a socialist vision where the laborer is the sustainer of society.
  • Saunders’ Assassination (December 1928): To avenge the death of Lala Lajpat Rai following a brutal police lathi charge, Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, and Shivaram Rajguru targeted the police officer responsible and assassinated John Saunders.
  • Central Legislative Assembly Bombing (April 1929): Bhagat Singh and Batukeswar Dutt (B.K. Dutt) threw two low-intensity, non-lethal bombs into the Central Legislative Assembly in Delhi alongside revolutionary leaflets. Their declared motive was not to kill, but “to make the deaf hear” and highlight colonial exploitation.
  • Martyrdom of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, and Rajguru: After enduring long prison hunger strikes against the mistreatment of Indian political prisoners, Bhagat Singh (aged 23), Sukhdev, and Rajguru were executed by hanging on 23 March 1931.

Armed Resistance by Women Revolutionaries (1930s)

  • Student Revolutionaries: Schoolgirls and young women actively participated in armed actions.
  • Comilla (1931): Two students, Suniti Chowdhury and Shanti Ghosh, assassinated a British District Magistrate.
  • Calcutta (1932): Bina Das, a student at Calcutta University, made a daring attempt on the life of the Governor of Bengal during a convocation ceremony to protest British subjugation; she was sentenced to nine years’ rigorous imprisonment.

Guerrilla Tribal Movements: The Gudem Hills Uprising (1922–1924)

  • In the Gudem Hills of Andhra Pradesh, Alluri Sitaram Raju led tribal peasants in an armed guerrilla movement against British forest laws and forced unpaid labor (begar).
  • Although inspired by Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement (promoting khadi and giving up alcohol), Raju asserted that India could be freed only through force, directing attacks on colonial police stations and British officials until his capture and execution in 1924.

Colonial Repression and the Symbol of Cellular Jail

  • British authorities responded to revolutionary actions with severe suppression, collective fines, executions without regular trials, and deportations.
  • The Cellular Jail (Kala Pani): Established in the Andaman Islands as a remote prison for solitary confinement, hard labor (such as extracting oil by hand), and psychological subjugation of revolutionaries like Barindra Ghose and V.D. Savarkar, becoming an enduring symbol of ultimate nationalist sacrifice.

Reference NCERT Documents

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess301.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hess208.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/lehs303.pdf

Swadeshi Movement Upsc Ncert Notes

Origin and Immediate Trigger

  • The Swadeshi movement was sparked in 1905 by the British government’s decision under Viceroy Lord Curzon to partition the Bengal Presidency.
  • The official British justification was “administrative convenience”, but the real intent was to curb the political influence of Bengali politicians, weaken their solidarity, and divide Bengal along religious lines into a largely Muslim east and Hindu west.
  • The partition plan triggered widespread outrage across India, bringing together both Moderate and Radical factions of the Indian National Congress to oppose the measure.

Key Leaders and Geographical Spread

  • In Bengal, key leaders who united people across communities included Surendranath Banerjee, Rabindranath Tagore, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Ashwini Kumar Dutt.
  • The movement fostered the prominence of the “Lal-Bal-Pal” trio—Lala Lajpat Rai (Punjab), Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Maharashtra), and Bipin Chandra Pal (Bengal)—who gave the struggle a pan-Indian character.
  • While Bengal was the epicentre, the movement echoed across India; notably, in deltaic Andhra, it became known as the Vandemataram Movement.
  • The Swadeshi movement of 1905–07 significantly broadened the appeal of the Indian National Congress among the middle classes.

Core Methods of Protest and Mass Action

  • Boycott of Foreign Goods: Mass bonfires of imported cloth, sugar, and other British goods were lit in public streets to decrease economic dependence on British manufactures.
  • Boycott of British Institutions: Protestors extended the boycott to government schools, colleges, and colonial law courts.
  • Promotion of Swadeshi Enterprise: Wearing clothing made from fabric spun and woven in India became a badge of self-reliance and national pride.
  • Precedents and New Enterprises: The movement built on earlier self-reliance ventures and inspired further domestic entrepreneurship:
    • Jamsetji Tata’s Swadeshi Mills (Bombay, 1886).
    • Punjab National Bank (Lahore, 1895), established exclusively with Indian capital by leaders including Lala Lajpat Rai.
    • Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (1901), founded by chemist Prafulla Chandra Ray.
  • National Education: To combat the denationalising impact of British education, leaders launched the National Council of Education and established the Bengal National College in 1906, with Aurobindo Ghose serving as its first principal.

Cultural and Symbolic Expressions

  • Vande Mataram as a Rallying Cry: Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s song Vande Mataram (originally composed in 1875 and later featured in his novel Anandamath) became the mantra and anthem of the movement, prompting the colonial administration to ban its public singing.
  • Raksha Bandhan for Communal Solidarity: Protesters tied rakhis on each other’s wrists as a symbol of unity—especially between Hindus and Muslims—to counter the colonial strategy of division.
  • Visual Symbols of Bharat Mata:
    • Abanindranath Tagore painted his iconic image of Bharat Mata in 1905, portraying the nation as an ascetic, spiritual, calm, and composed mother figure dispensing learning, food, and clothing.
    • The personification of India as “Mother India” became a central theme in nationalist speeches, poems, and writings, such as Subramania Bharati’s poems and his magazine Vijaya in Madras, as well as Lala Lajpat Rai’s publication Vande Mataram in Punjab.
  • Swadeshi Tricolour Flag: A tricolour flag in red, green, and yellow was designed in Bengal during the movement, featuring eight lotuses representing the eight British Indian provinces and a crescent moon representing Hindus and Muslims.
  • Revival of Folklore: Nationalist leaders gathered folklore, ballads, and legends to instill national pride; in Bengal, Rabindranath Tagore personally collected folk tales, rhymes, and myths to lead a folk-revival movement.

Political Shift and Radicalisation

  • Critique of Moderates: Radical leaders criticized the Moderates’ traditional “politics of prayers” and petitions, asserting that self-reliance, constructive action, and mass mobilization were essential to attain swaraj (self-rule).
  • The Bande Mataram Daily: In 1906, Bipin Chandra Pal launched the English daily Bande Mataram, soon edited by Aurobindo Ghose, which articulated a “doctrine of passive resistance” and declared that nothing short of absolute national autonomy would satisfy the movement.
  • Calcutta Session (1906): Under the presidency of Dadabhai Naoroji, the Indian National Congress formally endorsed the fourfold programme of Swaraj, Swadeshi, Boycott, and National Education.
  • 1907 Surat Split: Conflicts over the Swadeshi agenda—especially the use of boycott and the demand for full Swaraj versus administrative concessions—led to a split between the Moderates and the Nationalists/Radicals at the Surat Congress session.
  • Emergence of Revolutionary Groups: The anti-partition agitation radicalised youth, spurring revolutionary activities and secret societies such as the Anushilan Samiti (1902) in Bengal, revolutionary publications like Yugantar, and attempts on oppressive British officials (such as the 1908 attempt by Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki on Judge Kingsford).

Outcomes

  • Annulment of Partition (1911): Due to unrelenting mass resistance and boycott, the British government eventually withdrew and annulled the partition of Bengal in 1911.
  • Capital Relocation: Alongside the annulment in 1911, the imperial capital was shifted from Calcutta to Delhi.

Reference Ncert Documents

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/lehs303.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hess208.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hees202.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf

Partition of Bengal (1905) Upsc Ncert Notes

Context and Territorial Scope

  • In the early 20th century, Bengal was the largest province of British India, encompassing areas extending to present-day Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Assam.
  • Viceroy Lord George Curzon floated the plan and announced the partition of Bengal in 1905.

Administrative Rationale vs. Underlying Motives

  • Official Rationale: The British government officially justified the division on grounds of “administrative convenience” and putting in place a more efficient administration.
  • Commercial and Official Interests: The administrative rationale was closely linked to the practical interests of British officials and businessmen.
  • Divide and Rule Policy: Rather than separating non-Bengali areas (such as Bihar or parts of Odisha), the government partitioned East Bengal and merged it with Assam.
  • Political Objectives: The primary motives were to curb the growing influence of Bengali politicians, weaken their solidarity, and divide the population by separating Bengal’s largely Muslim eastern section from its largely Hindu western section.

Immediate Reactions and Community Impact

  • Nationwide Outrage: The decision infuriated people across India and was seen as a deliberate attack on Bengali identity and cultural coexistence.
  • Unification of Congress Factions: Both the Moderates and the Radicals within the Indian National Congress stood firmly united against the partition.
  • Leaders at the Forefront: Prominent figures leading the opposition included Rabindranath Tagore, Surendranath Banerjee, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Ashwini Kumar Dutt.
  • Communal Divergence: While Hindus and Muslims had historically lived in peace in Bengal, the move eventually sharpened communal divides. Several Muslim leaders came to support the partition following British promises of separate administrative posts and regional development in East Bengal, leading to the establishment of the All-India Muslim League at Dacca in 1906.

Mass Protests and Symbols of Resistance

  • Public Mobilisation: Vast public meetings, demonstrations, student rallies, and processions multiplied across Calcutta and other towns.
  • Raksha Bandhan as a Symbol of Unity: To resist British division and signify communal brotherhood, people tied rakhis on each other’s wrists.
  • Patriotic Anthems: Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s song Vande Mataram (originally composed in 1875) became the rallying cry and mantra of the 1905 movement, leading the British administration to ban its singing in public streets.

The Swadeshi and Boycott Movements

  • Economic Resistance: The anti-partition agitation directly sparked the twin programmes of Swadeshi (“of one’s own country”) and Boycott.
  • Boycott of Foreign Goods: Mass bonfires of imported cloth and British commodities (like foreign sugar) were lit in streets to reduce reliance on British manufactures.
  • Promotion of Indigenous Enterprise: People embraced hand-spun, domestic fabrics as symbols of national pride. The momentum strengthened indigenous industry, building on enterprises like Jamsetji Tata’s Swadeshi Mills (1886), the Punjab National Bank (1895), and Prafulla Chandra Ray, commonly called as P.C. Ray’s Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (1901).
  • Boycott of British Institutions: The boycott was extended to colonial courts, schools, and government colleges, although alternative domestic infrastructure was initially inadequate.
  • Geographical Spread: While strongest in Bengal, the agitation spread across the subcontinent, such as in deltaic Andhra, where it was known as the Vandemataram Movement.

Rise of Radical Politics and National Education

  • Rise of the Radicals: Leaders such as the ‘Lal-Bal-Pal’ trio (Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal) openly challenged the Moderates’ “politics of petitions and prayers”. They advocated mass mobilisation, swaraj, and constructive self-reliance.
  • Advocacy for Swaraj: In 1906, Bipin Chandra Pal launched the daily Bande Mataram (later edited by Aurobindo Ghose), demanding absolute national autonomy. In December 1906, the Calcutta session of Congress adopted Swaraj, Swadeshi, Boycott, and National Education as official goals.
  • National Council of Education: To counteract the denationalising impact of British schooling, the National Council of Education and the Bengal National College were established in 1906, with Aurobindo Ghose serving as its first principal.
  • Emergence of Revolutionary Action: Discontent led to the formation of revolutionary societies such as the Anushilan Samiti (1902) in Bengal, with publications like Yugantar and figures like Barindra Kumar Ghose, Khudiram Bose, and Prafulla Chaki resorting to physical resistance and revolutionary violence.

Annulment of the Partition

  • Due to continuous, intense popular resistance and escalating mass agitation, the British colonial government was eventually compelled to withdraw and annul the partition of Bengal in 1911.
  • Alongside the annulment, the British transferred the imperial capital of India from Calcutta to Delhi in 1911.

Reference Ncert Document

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hess208.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/hees202.pdf

Independence revolutions in Latin America during the 19th century

Revolution in Latin America

The regions of Latin America were conquered by the Spanish in the sixteenth century. The Portuguese and the French also had their presence there. The political power of the South American cultures such as the Incas and the Aztecs was destroyed by these colonial powers.

The colonisers (conquistadores) brought to an end the local religious beliefs and introduced the Catholic religion. The colonial rule in Latin America was brutal and was marked by widespread genocide and decimation of the indigenous population.

The native people were made to work as slave labourers in the farmlands as well as the mines of the colonial masters who exported goods such as sugar, coffee, gold, and silver to European nations. Latin America today consists of many nations such as Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Chile, Venezuela, and Caribbean countries in Central and South America.

The Haitian Revolution

Haiti, earlier known as Saint-Domingue(as the French called their colony) was the richest French colony (1659–1804) in the Caribbean Sea. Its plantations produced more sugar than all of Europe’s other Caribbean and American colonies put together.

The island’s indigenous population, forced to mine for gold, was devastated by European diseases and brutal working conditions, and by the end of the sixteenth century it had virtually vanished. Landowners in western Hispaniola imported increasing numbers of African slaves.

By 1789, the estimated 556,000 population of Saint-Domingue included 500,000 African slaves, 32,000 European colonists (whites), and 24,000 free affranchis or mulattoes (black people of mixed African and European descent).

News of the storming of the Bastille was followed by armed defiance of the royal governor. Vincent Ogé, a mulatto, who had lobbied with the Parisian assembly for colonial reforms, led an uprising in late 1790 but was captured and executed.

In May 1791 the French revolutionary government granted citizenship to the wealthier mulattoes who had even owned slaves. But Haiti’sEuropean populationdisregarded the law. Within two monthsisolated fi ghting brokeout between European whites and mulattoes.

All of them expected the black slaves to continue working, suffering and dying as if nothing had changed. But they took them by surprise when in August thousands of slaves rose in rebellion.

The European whites attempted to appease the mulattoes to quell the slave revolt. The French National Assembly granted citizenship to all mulattoes in April 1792. The country was torn by rival factions, some of which were playing into the hands of Spanish colonists in Santo Domingo or of British troops from Jamaica.

In 1793, a commissioner, LégerFélicité Sonthonax, was sent from France to maintain order. He offered freedom to slaveswho joined his army. He soon abolished slaveryaltogether, a decision ratified subsequently by the French government.

In the late 1790s, Toussaint L’Ouverture, a military leader and former slave, gained control of several areas. Napoleon sent a fleet of 12,000 troops to seize control ofSaint-Domingue fromToussaint L’Ouverture’sforces. The war which followed was prolonged and bloody. At one point the French army seemed to have won after Toussaint was misled into believing in the possibility of conciliating with the enemy.

But he was kidnapped and killed. His former lieutenant Dessalines rose to the occasion and organised black resistance. He defeated Napoleon’s army. Saint-Domingue became the independent black state of Haiti in 1804.

Venezuela and New Granada (now Colombia)

Inspired by The Haitian Revolution, slavesin Venezuela rose in rebellion in the 1790s.Creoles (persons of mixed European and black descent) wanted an expansion of the free trade that was benefiting their plantation economy. At the same time, however, they feared that the removal of Spanish control might bring about a revolution that would destroy their own power.

Therefore, they formed the strong loyalist faction in the Viceroyalty of New Granada. In 1808 Napoleon had made his brother Joseph the king of Spain after the abdication of the weak king Charles IV in favour of his son Ferdinand. Napoleon had them both imprisoned.

With Charles and Ferdinand removed from the scene, the Empire was without a stable government for six years. The political crisis in Spain provided the opportunity for the assertion of its colonies. Soon the rebels, as patriots, organised revolutionary governments that introduced some social and economic reforms in 1810.

In Venezuela, the patriots led by Simón Bolívar openly declared a break with Spain the following year. The earthquake that wreaked particular destruction in patriot-held areas in 1812 provided the pretext for loyalist forces to crush the patriots’ army, and drive Bolívar and others to seek refuge in New Granada (the heart of the viceroyalty).

Bolívar soon returned to Venezuela with a new army in 1813 and waged a campaign with the army’s motto, “Guerra a muerte” (“War to the death”). The army led by loyalist José Tomás Boves again succeeded in driving Bolívar out of his home country. By 1815, independence movements in Venezuela and almost all across Spanish South America seemed dead.

A large military expedition sent by Ferdinand VII in that year re-conquered Venezuela and most of New Granada. Yet another invasion led byBolívar in 1816 failed. The following year (1817) a larger and revitalised independence movement emerged, winning the struggle in the north and taking it into the Andean highlands.

Bolivar emerged as a strong military and political force after the struggles. At this point, a group of llaneros (cowboys) of mixed ethnicity led by José Antonio Páez joined the struggle and contributed decisively to the patriots’ military victories in1818–19. After leading his army up the face of the eastern Andes, Bolívar dealt a crushing defeat to his enemies in the Battle of Boyaca.

Consolidating victory in the north proved difficult. A congress that Bolívar convened in Angostura in 1819 named Bolívar as president of Gran Colombia, a union of what are today Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, and Ecuador.

But the sharp divisions prevailing in the region ultimately dashed Bolívar’s hopes of uniting the former Spanish colonies into a single new nation as the United States of Latin America. Furthermore, loyalist supporters still held much of Venezuela, parts of the ColombianAndes, and all of Ecuador. Conditions became favourable in 1820; troops waiting in Cádiz to be sent as part of the crown’s military campaigns revolted.

Eventually New Granada and Venezuela were liberated in 1821. A congress held that year in Cúcuta, a Colombian city, chose Bolívar president of a now much more centralised Gran Colombia.

Simon Bolivar: Bolivar belonged to an oldaristocratic Creole family in Caracas. He wasof fundamental importance to the movementas an ideologue and military leader. In hismost famous “Jamaica Letter” (writtenduring one of his periods of exile, 1815),Bolívar affirmed his undying faith in thecause of independence, even in the face of thepatriots’ repeated defeats.

While critiquingSpanish colonialism, Bolívar held the viewthat the only path for the former colonieswas the establishment of an autonomous andcentralised republican government. The typeof republic that he eventually espoused wasvery much an oligarchic one.

He believedthat a virtuous governing system wouldnot be possible if the nation was divided byethnicity. Bolivar was an inspiring figure toleft-wing and emancipatory movements inLatin America even in the latter half of thetwentieth century.

Mexican Revolution

The independence of Mexico came late. Mexico had a powerful segment of Creoles and Peninsulars, who were the colonial masters born in Spain or Portugal. For many of the powerful in Mexican society, a break with Spain meant a loss of traditional status and power.

Between 1808 and 1810, Peninsulars had acted aggressively to preserve Spain’s power in the region. Rejecting the notion of a congress that would address the question of governance in the absence of the Spanish king, leading Peninsulars in Mexico City deposed the viceroy and persecuted Creoles.

They then welcomed weaker viceroys whom they knew they could dominate. Peninsulars’ efforts could not, however, prevent the emergence of an independence struggle. The revolution in Mexico was led by a Catholic priest, Miguel Hidalgo.

He supported the poor people of Mexico and sympathised with the poor living conditions of Native Americans. His emotional speeches at the Church of Dolores called for an independent Mexico. He led a revolutionary army consisting of Mestizos against the army of Spain and Creoles.

However, he was defeated and killed in 1811. Later, the movement was led by José María Morelos, who declared independence from Spain in 1813. Hewas also defeated in 1815.

Mexican Revolution: The independence of Mexico came late. Mexico had a powerful segment of Creoles and Peninsulars, who were the colonial masters born in Spain or Portugal. For many of the powerful in Mexican society, a break with Spain meant a loss of traditional status and power.

Between 1808and 1810, Peninsulars had acted to preserve Spain’s power in the region aggressively. Rejecting the notion of a congress that would address the question of governance in the absence of the Spanish king, leading Peninsulars in Mexico City deposed the viceroy and persecuted Creoles.

They then welcomed weaker viceroys whom they knew they could dominate. Peninsulars’ efforts could not, however, prevent the emergence of an independence struggle. The revolution in Mexico was led by a Catholic priest, Miguel Hidalgo.

He supported the poor people of Mexico and sympathised with the poor living conditions of Native Americans. His emotional speeches at the Church of Dolores called for an independent Mexico. He led a revolutionary army consisting of Mestizos.

The Creoles, or the wealthy merchants, were watching the developments in Spain where a movement to overthrow the monarchy and to make a new constitution was afoot.

Thinking that this might reduce the power of the Creoles, they declared independence in 1821. It is interesting to note that the person who led the movement was the same officer who defeated the army of Maria Morelos. He declared himself as the emperor whose ruthless rule was finally overthrown. In 1824, Mexico declared itself a republic.

Independence of Brazil

Brazil was a colony of Portugal. When Napoleon invaded Portugal in 1808, thePortuguese emperorDam Joao (John VI), fled to Brazil. He had developed the colony in all aspects by introducing land reforms and establishing military, medical, and art schools.

Even after the defeat of Napoleon, the Portuguese ruler continued to stay in Brazil. But when his power was challenged, he decided to go to Portugal, leaving the colony of Brazil in the hands of his son Dom Pedro. The reliance of the Brazilian upper classes on African slavery favoured their continued ties with Portugal.

Plantation owners depended on the African slave trade, which Portugal controlled. The size of the slave population – approximately half the total of the Brazilian population in 1800 – also meant that Creoles shied away from political initiatives that might mean a loss of control over their social inferiors.

Therefore, the Portuguese authorities at home put an end to the reforms undertaken by Joaoin Brazil. They wanted Dom Pedro to return to Portugal. However, Pedro declared Brazil’sindependence and decided to stay on. In 1822, Brazil obtained independence from Portugal, and it became the only constitutional monarchy in South America, with Pedro I becoming its first emperor.

Other Revolts

The liberator of Argentina, San Martín, joined the Chilean liberator Bernardo O’Higgins, and both were able to get independence for Chile in 1818, followed by Peru in 1820. Bolivar and SanMartin met at the port in Ecuador, Guayaquil,to discuss the future course of action in Latin America and for a probable unification.

While San Martin wanted a European form of government with a constitutional monarchy in the colonies, Bolivar wanted a republican form of government. Though they could not reach any agreement, San Martin retired and allowed Bolivar to take full command. Bolivar could get independence for all South American colonies by 1826.

After the independence of all the colonies, Bolivar tried to unite all Latin American countries under one nation called Gran Colombia. However, the rugged geographical features with mountains and forests, along with power struggles, could not make it a reality.

Though most of the Latin American countries declared themselves as republics and were free from Spanish rule, they were still dependent to a greater extent on foreign powers. While Mexico was invaded by the US and France, inthe course of the nineteenth century, Britain continued to exercise its dominating influence over countries like Argentina and Chile for a long time to come. In each Latin American country, oligarchic cliques ran rival Liberal and Conservative parties and preserved unequal social structure characterised by extreme privilege to great landowners and grinding poverty to the underprivileged.

In the twentieth century, especially after World War II, South America was a troubled continent as the USA sought to control it by pliant dictatorial governments (often referred to as banana republics).

* * All the Notes in this blog, are referred from Tamil Nadu State Board Books and Samacheer Kalvi Books. Kindly check with the original Tamil Nadu state board books and Ncert Books.