The Lok Sabha is the lower house of Parliament. It consists of MPs (Members of Parliament).
There are 543 constituencies and each constituency.
The maximum seat mentioned in the constitution is 550. Which is divided into 530 MP from states and up to 20 members from Union Territories based on their population.
Delimitation of Constituencies
Lok Sabha seats by state and union territories are determined by the Delimitation of constituencies.
By the Delimitation Act of 2002, the Delimitation Commission of India has delimited the list of Parliamentary constituencies, reservation status, and constituent assembly segments.
The first state election that followed new demarcated assembly constituencies was in the Legislative Assembly election of 2008 in Karnataka.
Other assembly elections conducted in 2008, such as assembly elections in Chhattisgarh, Madya Pradesh, Delhi, Mizoram, and Rajasthan followed newly defined assembly constituencies.
The size of Assembly Constituencies is determined as Section 4 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, by an Independent Delimitation Commission.
By the constitutional amendment of 1976 delimitation was suspended after the census of 2001.
But, some amendments to the constitution were made in 2001 and 2003, freeze on the number of existing seats allocated to the states in the Lok Sabha (House of People) and State Legislative Assemblies based on the 1971 census to be used after the year 2026.
This is done based on the 2001 census and the extent of such constituencies as delimited remain frozen till 2026.
The reserved seats of SC/ST shall be reworked based on the 2001 census.
Conclusion
The Delimitation commission set under by Delimitation Act 2002, was given a job to readjust all parliamentary and assembly constituencies in the country except J&K, based on population by 2001 census. The Union Government nullified it by ordinance for Jharkhand. The Union Government passed four separate orders Under Sec 10 A of the Delimitation Act 2002, deferring delimitation in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Nagaland.
Judicial review is a process of review by the Judiciary for the actions done by the executive or legislature. The court may review invalidate laws acts and government actions that are incompatible.
By Articles 32 (Right to Constitution Remedy) and Article 136 (Special leave to appeal by the supreme court).
Judicial review in India is based on the “Procedure established by the Law“, as given in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The law created by the Government needs to pass the test of constitutionality. If such a law made by the government qualifies it can be made a law otherwise the court can declare it null and void.
Judicial Review in Indian Constitution Upsc By Carptrash at the English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1616823
Judicial review Article
Under Article 13, it is the compulsion of judicial review that was described in fundamental rights in Part III. It is stated that the Union of the states shall not make such rules that take away or abridges the essential rights of the people.
Article 13 – Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights.
What is the procedure of judicial review in India?
Judicial review is governed by “Procedure” established by law by Article 21. Any law has to obey the constitution, if it qualifies it can be made a law. But the court can declare it null and void.
Judicial review in simple terms
Judicial Review in Indian Constitution is the power of the courts of a country to test the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative bodies of the government and to determine whether such actions obey the rules and law mentioned in the constitution.
The actions judged inconsistent or do not obey the constitution are declared unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void.
Article 136 of the Indian constitution
By Article 136 vests the Supreme Court of India, the top most court in Indian Federation, with a special power to grant special leave, to appeal against any judgment or order or decree in any matter or cause, passed or made by any Court/tribunal in the territory of India.
Power of judicial review in India?
Article 13 – Article 13 provides for the judicial review of all legislation in India. This power has been conferred on the High Court and the Supreme court of India.
The 3 Principles of Judicial Review
The constitution is the ultimate law of India. The Apex Court, the Supreme court of India has complete and ultimate authority in ruling on constitutional matters.
The judiciary can make an action, decision, or law null and void if that conflicts with the constitution.
Is Judicial Review good?
It plays an important role in ensuring the government and its arms such as Legislative, Executive, and Administrative parts recognize the limits of its own power. Also, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down the actions that violate the constitution.
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2018 in India:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Verdict/Significance
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India
September 26, 2018
Aadhaar and Right to Privacy
Upheld the constitutionality of Aadhaar for welfare schemes but struck down its mandatory use in private sectors.
Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India
September 6, 2018
Section 377 (LGBTQ+ Rights)
Decriminalized homosexuality by partially striking down Section 377 of the IPC.
Joseph Shine vs. Union of India
September 27, 2018
Adultery Law
Declared Section 497 of the IPC (Adultery law) unconstitutional, decriminalizing adultery.
Sabarimala Temple Case (Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. State of Kerala)
September 28, 2018
Women’s Entry in Sabarimala Temple
Allowed women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala temple, striking down the ban on women aged 10–50 years.
Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. (Hadiya Case)
March 8, 2018
Right to Marry (Personal Liberty)
Upheld the right of an adult woman to marry and convert as per her choice, reinforcing personal liberty.
Centre for PIL vs. Union of India
July 6, 2018
Chief Justice as the ‘Master of Roster’
Reaffirmed that the Chief Justice of India is the ‘Master of the Roster’ and has exclusive authority to allocate cases.
Common Cause vs. Union of India
March 9, 2018
Passive Euthanasia
Legalized passive euthanasia and recognized living wills, ensuring dignity in death under Article 21.
Independent Thought vs. Union of India
October 2018
Child Marital Rape
Clarified that sexual intercourse with a minor wife amounts to rape, furthering child protection laws.
Bhima Koregaon Case
August 2018
Arrests of Activists
Ordered house arrest for activists accused in the Bhima Koregaon violence, raising concerns on liberty and dissent.
Important Supreme court verdicts of 2019
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2019 in India:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Verdict/Significance
Ayodhya Land Dispute Case
November 9, 2019
Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid Land Dispute
Awarded the disputed land to a trust for constructing a Ram Temple and allocated alternative land for a mosque.
Sabarimala Review Case
November 14, 2019
Entry of Women into Sabarimala Temple
Referred the case to a larger bench while allowing the 2018 verdict permitting women of all ages to stand.
Rafale Deal Case
November 14, 2019
Rafale Fighter Jet Procurement
Dismissed review petitions, upholding the government’s clean chit in the Rafale fighter jet deal.
Right to Information for CJI’s Office
November 13, 2019
Transparency of Judiciary
Declared that the Chief Justice of India’s office falls under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
SC/ST Reservation in Promotions
February 2019
Reservation in Promotions
Upheld the validity of reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in public employment.
Kashmir Internet Shutdown Case
December 2019
Fundamental Rights (Article 19)
Declared that access to the internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 and directed the review of internet restrictions in Jammu & Kashmir.
Entry of Women in Armed Forces
February 2019
Gender Equality in Defense Services
Directed the Indian Army to grant permanent commissions to women in non-combat roles.
Contempt of Court (Prashant Bhushan Case)
December 2019
Contempt of Court
Found lawyer Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt for remarks about the judiciary while defending freedom of speech.
Important Supreme court verdicts of 2020
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2020 in India:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Verdict/Significance
Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India
January 10, 2020
Internet Shutdown in Jammu & Kashmir
Declared access to the internet a fundamental right under Article 19, ordering a review of internet restrictions in J&K.
Reservation in Promotions Case
February 7, 2020
SC/ST Reservation in Promotions
Held that reservation in promotions is not a fundamental right and left it to the discretion of the states.
Permanent Commission for Women in Armed Forces
February 17, 2020
Gender Equality in Armed Forces
Directed the government to grant permanent commissions to women officers in non-combat roles in the Army and Navy.
Shaheen Bagh Protests Case
October 7, 2020
Right to Protest vs. Public Order
Held that public places cannot be indefinitely occupied for protests, emphasizing the balance between protest rights and public convenience.
Prashant Bhushan Contempt Case
August 14, 2020
Freedom of Speech vs. Contempt of Court
Found Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt for tweets critical of the judiciary while imposing a token fine of ₹1.
Central Vista Project Case
December 2020
Redevelopment of Central Vista in Delhi
Allowed the Central Vista redevelopment project, stating it met legal and environmental norms.
Babita Puniya vs. Union of India
February 2020
Permanent Commission for Women in Army
Ordered equal opportunity for women to serve in commanding roles in the Army, rejecting gender stereotypes.
Habeas Corpus for Detained Leaders in J&K
March 2020
Detention of Political Leaders in J&K
Directed the release of political detainees in J&K after prolonged detention following the abrogation of Article 370.
Important Supreme court verdicts of 2021
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2021 in India:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Verdict/Significance
Maratha Reservation Case
May 5, 2021
Validity of Maratha Quota in Education & Jobs
Struck down the Maratha reservation as unconstitutional, ruling that the 50% reservation cap cannot be breached.
Pegasus Spyware Case
October 27, 2021
Right to Privacy and Surveillance
Appointed an independent committee to investigate allegations of Pegasus spyware use on citizens.
Sedition Law Case (Section 124A of IPC)
July 2021
Validity of Sedition Law
Expressed concerns about misuse of the sedition law and hinted at its reconsideration, leading to ongoing judicial scrutiny.
COVID-19 Oxygen Supply Case
April–May 2021
Right to Life (Article 21) During Pandemic
Directed the government to ensure adequate oxygen supply to hospitals during the second COVID-19 wave.
Farm Laws and Protests
January 12, 2021
Farm Laws and Farmers’ Protests
Stayed the implementation of three contentious farm laws and formed a committee to facilitate dialogue.
Central Vista Project Case
January 5, 2021
Redevelopment of Central Vista in Delhi
Upheld the legality of the Central Vista project, allowing construction to proceed.
Right to Protest Case
October 21, 2021
Public Protests (Shaheen Bagh Review)
Reiterated that public spaces cannot be indefinitely occupied for protests, balancing rights with public order.
Environment vs. Development (Sterlite Copper Case)
August 2021
Industrial Closure Due to Pollution
Refused to allow the reopening of the Sterlite Copper plant in Tamil Nadu due to environmental concerns.
EWS Quota Case
August 2021
10% Quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS)
Referred the matter of EWS reservation validity in educational institutions and jobs to a larger bench.
Important Supreme court verdicts of 2022
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2022 in India:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Verdict/Significance
EWS Reservation Case
November 7, 2022
Validity of 10% EWS Quota
Upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment providing a 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections in education and public jobs.
Hijab Ban Case
October 13, 2022
Right to Wear Hijab vs. Uniformity
Delivered a split verdict on whether banning hijabs in Karnataka schools violates constitutional rights, referring the case to a larger bench.
Abortion Rights Case
September 29, 2022
Reproductive Rights of Women
Declared unmarried women also have the right to safe abortion up to 24 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act.
Freebies Case
August 3, 2022
Election Promises and Freebies
Directed the formation of a committee to examine the impact of freebies promised by political parties on state finances.
PMLA Case (Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India)
July 27, 2022
Constitutionality of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)
Upheld the broad powers of the Enforcement Directorate under the PMLA, reinforcing anti-money laundering measures.
Election Commissioners’ Appointment Case
December 2022
Independence of Election Commission
Directed that appointments of Election Commissioners must be made by a committee including the Prime Minister, Chief Justice of India, and Leader of Opposition.
MediaOne Ban Case
March 2022
Freedom of Press
Lifted the government ban on MediaOne, reinforcing the importance of press freedom.
Places of Worship Act Case
October 2022
Validity of 1991 Act
Upheld the Places of Worship Act, emphasizing the need to maintain the secular character of the nation.
Delhi Municipal Corporation Case
May 2022
Delhi Government vs. Centre
Held that the Delhi government has legislative and executive powers over services except for public order, police, and land.
Live Streaming of Court Proceedings
September 27, 2022
Transparency in Judiciary
Allowed live streaming of constitutional bench hearings, enhancing public access to judicial proceedings.
Important Supreme court verdicts of 2023
Here’s a table summarizing important Supreme Court verdicts of 2023:
Case Name
Date
Key Issue/Topic
Demonetisation Policy Case
January 2, 2023
Upheld the 2016 demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1000 currency notes.
Chief Election Commissioner Appointments
March 2, 2023
Directed appointments of CEC and ECs via a committee comprising the PM, Leader of Opposition, and CJI.
Jallikattu and Bull-taming Sports
May 18, 2023
Upheld amendments permitting traditional sports like Jallikattu, Kambala, and bullock-cart races.
Article 370 Abrogation
October 2023
Validated the 2019 abrogation of J&K’s special status under Article 370.
Same-sex Marriage Recognition Case
October 17, 2023
Declined legal recognition of same-sex marriages, deferring the issue to Parliament.
Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown
May 2023
Allowed SC to directly grant divorce on grounds of irretrievable breakdown.
Delhi Government vs. LG
May 11, 2023
Gave the Delhi government control over services except public order, police, and land.
Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case
August 2023
Stayed conviction in the Modi surname defamation case, reinstating Lok Sabha membership.
Manual Scavenging Compensation Case
July 2023
Ordered ₹30 lakh compensation for manual scavenging deaths and ₹20 lakh for disabilities.
Broadcast Ban on MediaOne
April 2023
Lifted the ban on MediaOne, emphasizing the importance of press freedom.
The powers and functions of the supreme court come from the constitution as it seeks the Independence of the Supreme Court Judge in different ways.
As per Article 50, by DPSP (Directive Principles of State Policy), the state must take measures to separate the judiciary from the executive.
The most powerful feature of the constitution of India is the Independence of the Judiciary. The supreme court and also the high court are empowered to frame suo moto cases.
Suo Moto cases are the ones where the court is empowered to frame cases without receiving the formal petitions/complaints that include: Contempt of court
content of the constitution by the executive, legislature, citizen, etc.
The main purpose of the Supreme court is to safeguard the constitution.
This is mentioned in the basic structure of the constitution by Article 38(1) of DPSP, where it ensures that the state/judiciary shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing social order in which social, economic, and political justice.
Article 137 of the constitution lays down a provision to review its own judgment.
According to the article that any law made by parliament or any rules made under Article 145, the supreme court has the power to review any judgment or order made by it.
The Supreme court can nullify any decision of parliament and government on basis of violation of basic features.
It can overrule the impeachment process of the President and Judges which is passed by the parliament on the basis of constitutional validity or basic feature.
Under Order XL of the Supreme Court Rules, that have been framed under its powers under Article 145 of the constitution, the Supreme Court may review its judgment or order but no application for review is to be entertained in a civil proceeding except on the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Under Articles 129 and 142 of the constitution, the Supreme Court has been vested with the power to punish anyone for contempt of any court in India including itself(Supreme Court).
Article 145 of the Constitution of India gives power to the Supreme Court to frame its own rules with the approval of the President for regulating court practice and procedures.
Three versions of the rules have been published in 1950,1966, 2013. A new rooster system is introduced on 5 February 2018 for allocation of the subject to judges by this:
CJI will hear special leave petitions (SLP) and public interest matters such as social justice, elections, arbitration, criminal matters, etc. Other senior judges/ collegium will hear subjects on labor disputes, taxation, compensation, consumer protection, maritime law, mortgage, personal law, land acquisition, service, company matters, etc.
The election commission of India is an autonomous body under the ownership of the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. It is established by the Constitution of India.
This ensures free and fair elections in the nation.
Structure of Election Commission of India
The commission was established in 1950 and Originally has One Chief Election Commissioner. Then two additional commissioners were appointed on 16 October 1989 for a short tenure.
Then Election Commissioner Amendment Act, 1989 was adopted on 1 January 1990 that turned the commission into a multi-member body. The Election commission of India has Chief Election Commissioner and two Election Commissioner, who are usually retired IAS officers.
Salaries
The election commissioner draws their salaries and allowances on par with the Judges of the Supreme court of India. This is mentioned in “Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioner (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1992.
This commission has its secretariat located in New Delhi.
Article of Election Commission – Artcle 324
Role of Election Commission of India
Article 324 provides the power of direction and control of elections of parliament, state legislature, the office of President of India, and office of vice president.
It is an all-India body, that is common to both the Central and State government.
It must be noted that the Election commission of India does not conduct an election for Panchayat and Municipal elections. They are conducted by the State election commission.
Chief election commissioner of India
Chief Election Commission of India
Chief Election Commissioner of India is the head of the Election Commission of India. He/She is usually a member of the ICS (Indian Civil Service) and mostly selected from the IAS (Indian Administrative Service).
Since 2 December 2018, Shri. Sunil Arora is the Chief Election Commissioner of India. The tenure of this post is 6 years or up to 65 years of age whichever is earlier. This post has depute, that is Deputy Election Commissioners of India. He/She is appointed by the President of India. His/Her compensation is ₹250,000 Monthly.
By the Election Commission (Condition of Service of Election Commissions and Transaction of Business) Act of 1991, the salary of the Chief Election Commissioner of India is the same as the salary of a Judge of the Supreme Court of India.
When the President, appoints other election commissioners for help they too receive the salary same as Judge of the Supreme Court of India.
Removal of Chief election Commissioner of India
One Appointed, He/She can be removed by two-thirds of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, present and voting against the Chief Election Commissioner of India for disorderly conduct or improper actions.
Important Articles Related to Appointment, Role, and Functions of Governor
Articles 153 to 167 in Part Vi deals with the government in states.
Article 154 – The executive powers of the state shall be vested in the governor and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him based on the constitution. (மாநிலத்தின் Executive அதிகாரங்கள் ஆளுநரிடம் ஒப்படைக்கப்படும், மேலும் அவர் நேரடியாகவோ அல்லது அவருக்கு கீழான அதிகாரிகள் மூலமாகவோ பயன்படுத்தப்படுவார்.)
Article 163 – There shall be a council of ministers with the chief minister as the head to aid and advise the governor in the exercise of his function, except in so far as he is required to exercise his functions in his discretion. (ஆளுநருக்கு தனது செயல்பாட்டைச் செயல்படுத்துவதில் உதவி செய்வதற்கும் ஆலோசனை வழங்குவதற்கும் முதலமைச்சருடன், அமைச்சரவை(council of ministers) இருக்க வேண்டும், தவிர, அவர் தனது விருப்பப்படி தனது செயல்பாடுகளைச் செய்ய வேண்டியது அவசியம்.)
Article 164 – The council of ministers shall be collectively responsible to the legislative of state. This provision is the foundation of the parliamentary system of government in the state. (அமைச்சரவை மாநில சட்டமன்றத்திற்கு கூட்டாக பொறுப்பாகும்.)
Vice Governor
There is no office of vice-governor in the state like vice-president at the centre. (மாநிலத்தில் துணை ஆளுநர் பதவி இல்லை)
Who is Governor?
The governor is the chief executive head of state. (ஆளுநர் தலைமை நிர்வாக தலைவராக உள்ளார்.)
The governor is the nominal or titular or constitutional head. (ஆளுநர் பெயரளவு அல்லது பெயரிடப்பட்ட அல்லது அரசியலமைப்பு தலைவராக உள்ளார்.)
The governor is acting as an agent to the central government. Thereby the office of the governor has a dual role. (ஆளுநர் மத்திய அரசின் முகவராக செயல்படுகிறார். இதன்மூலம் ஆளுநர் அலுவலகத்திற்கு இரட்டை பங்கு உண்டு.)
There can be a governor for two or more states which is facilitated by the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1956. (1956 ஆம் ஆண்டின் 7 வது அரசியலமைப்பு திருத்தச் சட்டத்தின் மூலம் இரண்டு அல்லது அதற்கு மேற்பட்ட மாநிலங்களுக்கு ஒரே நபரை ஆளுநராக நியமிக்க உதவியது)
How the Governor is Appointed?
The governor is appointed by the president by warrant under his hand and seal. (ஆளுநர், ஜனாதிபதியால் அவரது கை மற்றும் முத்திரையின் கீழ் வாரண்ட் மூலம் நியமிக்கப்படுகிறார்)
The governor is neither elected by people nor indirectly elected by a specially constituted electoral college which done to elect the President of India. (ஆளுநர் மக்களால் தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்படுவதில்லை அல்லது இந்திய ஜனாதிபதியைத் தேர்ந்தெடுப்பதற்காக சிறப்பாக அமைக்கப்பட்ட இந்தியாவின் வாக்காளர் குழு மூலம் மறைமுகமாக தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்படுவதில்லை.)
The Company rules are Regulating Act of 1773, Pitts India Act of 1784, Charter Act of 1793, Charter Act of 1833, and Charter Act of 1853. These rules came between 1773 to 1858. After 1858, the rules formed were called the Crown Rule.
Regulating Act of 1773
Regulating Act of 1773 was the first step by the British Crown to laid laws to regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India. It also laid the foundation of central administration in India.
Features ofthe Regulating Act of 1773
The Governor of Bengal was designated as Governor-General of Bengal. The Executive Council of four members was created to assist the Governor-General of Bengal.
Lord Warren Hastings was the first Governor-General of Bengal. Earlier, the three presidencies were independent, but now the Governor of Madras and Bombay presidencies were made subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal.
The Supreme Court of Calcutta was established in 1774 with one chief justice and three other judges.
Prohibited the workers of the company from doing private trade. Also, the workers of the company were prohibited from accepting Gifts or bribes from the native people.
British control over the company was strengthened by making the Court of Directors report its affairs, such as revenue, and civil and military affairs, to the British Government.
Act of Settlement or Amending Act of 1781
Regulating the Act of 1773 had some defects. To rectify those defects Act of Settlement or the Amending Act of 1781 was made.
The Amending Act of 1781 features
It exempts the acts done by the Governor-General and the Council from the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for their official action. It also exempts the worker of the company from the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for their official action.
It exempts the revenue and revenue collection from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court will have jurisdiction over the inhabitants of Calcutta.
The Supreme Court is required to administer the personal law of defendants. Hindu law for Hindus and Mohammedan Law for Muslims.
The appeal from the Provincial Courts could be taken to the Governor-General-in-Council and not to the Supreme Court.
Now, the Provincial court and council regulations could be framed by the Governor-in-Council.
Pitts India act of 1784
Pitt’s India Act (1784), was named after the British prime minister William Pitt the Younger. It was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain intended to address the drawbacks of the Regulating Act of 1773.
Pitts India act of 1784 features
The Pitts India Act (1784), distinguished the Political and Commercial functions of the company. By Pitts Acts, the Court of Directors will manage the commercial affairs, and the Board of Control will manage Political affairs. By this policy, the Double Government System is established.
It increased the power of the Board of Control in affairs of revenue and civil and military government possession in India. After, the Company territories were first time called British Possessions in India.
Then the British government had supreme power over the company.
Charter Act of 1786
It was a supplementary act passed in 1786. This act made Lord Cornwallis appointed as the Governor-general of Bengal.
Act of 1786 features
Lord Cornwallis was appointed as the 2nd governor-general of Bengal, and the effective ruler of British India by the authority of the Board of Control and Court of Directors.
By this law, the Governor-General got more powers and power over the Madras and Calcutta Presidencies.
This law also extended the trade Monopoly of East India Company in India for the next twenty years.
As per this act, the commander-in-chief was not to be a member of the Governor-General Council, unless he is appointed.
The members of the Board of Control and its servants are to be paid out of the Indian Revenue.
Charter Act of 1813 or East India Company Act, 1813
Charter Act of 1813 passed by the British Parliament renewed the East India Company’s charter for another 20 years.
Charter Act of 1813 features
This act abolished the EIC trade monopoly in India. EIC monopoly continued in tea and trade with China. This act asserted the sovereignty of the British Empire over the Company Territory of India.
It allowed Christian missionaries in India. It allowed western education for people in British Territories in India.
It allowed the local government to impose taxes and allowed punishment in case of non-payment of taxes.
Charter Act of 1833 or Saint Helena Act 1833
Charter Act of 1833 was passed in the British Parliament which renewed the East India Company’s charter for another 20 years. The company’s trade with China is brought to an end. This act allowed the Brits to settle freely in India.
Charter Act of 1833 Features
As per this Act, the Governor-General of Bengal made as to the Governor-General of India. He was vested with all the power of civil and military.
For the first time, the government of India has complete authority over the territory possessed by British in India. The powers of the Governor of Madras and Bombay were deprived.
The Governor-general of India was given full legislative power of the entire British possessions in India.
By the Charter Act of 1833, the laws made previous to this Act were called Regulations, and laws made by the Act of 1833 were called Acts. It also ended the EIC as a commercial body.
EIC then becomes the pure administrative body. This law provided the Company’s territories in India to the British Crown and its heirs and successors.
Introduced open competition for civil service exams to Indians. This law also states that Indians should not be debarred from holding any position under the company.
But it was negated after being opposed by the court of directors.
Charter Act of 1853
This is the last charter Act passed between 1793 and 1853, in British Parliament. This Act did not mention the time period of the company charter being renewed. Charter Act of 1853 empowered the British East India Company to retain the territories and the revenues in India in trust for the British crown and not mention its time and will be specified by the parliament.
Main features of charter act 1853
For the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General’s council were separated. It also provided an additional 6 members to the council called Legislative councillors. Out of 6 new legislative members, 4 members were appointed by the provincial governors of Madras, Bombay, Bengal, and Agra.
It established Indian Legislative Council and it adopted the procedures of the British Parliament. The Civil Services was opened to the Indians.
The committee on the Indian Civil Service was appointed in 1854, as Macaulay Committee. The Act also extended the EIC rule and allowed it to retain its territories in India on trust for the British Crown.
But it did not specify any time period like mentioned in the previous charters.
British laws in India after 1857 or Crown Rule
Government of India Act 1858
This act was passed after the Revolt of 1857. To know more about the Revolt of 1857 kindly check the book Indian War of Independence 1857. It aims to create a responsible government. Also, it abolished the East India Company and transferred its power to the British Crown.
Features of Government of India Act 1858
India will be governed by ‘Her Majesty’. The designation of Governor-general of India was changed to Viceroy of India.
Viceroy was the direct representative of the British Crown in India. The first Viceroy of India was Lord Canning.
It abolished the Board of Control and Court of Directors. Thereby double government is abolished. Then it created the Secretary of State for India.
Secretary of State, a new office that was responsible for the authority and control over the Indian administration. The Secretary of State is responsible for the British Parliament and is a member of the British Cabinet. The Secretary of the state is assisted by 15 member Council of India, which was established.
The secretary of state is made Chairman of the Council of India.
Indians Council Act of 1861
This act made significant changes in the Governor-General’s Council. The Indian Councils Act 1861 restored the power of legislation to the governor-in-councils of Madras and Bombay in respective matters.
Indian council act 1861 features
For the first time, Indians were associated with the law-making process. Some Indian were selected as non-official members of the expanded council by Viceroy.
These three Indians are selected to the legislative council by Lord Canning in 1862. They are Raja of Benaras, Maharaja of Patiala and Sir Dinkar Rao.
Decentralization of powers was initiated as Powers was restored to the Presidencies of Madras and Bombay.
As your centralization of powers started in 1773 by Regulating Act of 1773 and reached its zenith with the Charter Act of 1833.
By this New legislative councils were established for Bengal in 1862, North-Western Provinces in 1886, and Punjab in 1897.
It gave recognition to the portfolio system which was introduced by Lord Canning in 1859.
This act empowered the Viceroy to issue ordinances, without approval or informing the legislative council during an emergency and its life is 6 months.
Indian Council Act of 1892
Indian Councils Act 1892was an act of the British Parliament that increased the size of the legislative councils in India.
The act dealt exclusively with the powers, functions, and composition of the Legislative Councils in India.
Indian council act 1892 features
This Act increased the seats of non-official members in Provincial legislative councils and Central legislative councils. It maintained the official majority on them.
These acts increase the powers of the legislative council and gave powers of discussing the budget and other issues to the executive.
This act allowed the nomination of some non-official members of the a) Central Legislative Council by the viceroy based on the recommendation of the provincial legislative councils and the Bengal Chamber of commerce, And provincial legislative councils by the governors on the recommendation of the district boards, municipalities, universities, trade associations, zamindars, and chambers.
Indian Councils Act of 1909
Also referred to as Minto Morley reforms.
Features of Indian Council Act 1909
Both Central and Provincial legislative council sizes were increased. In Central legislative councils the seat increased from 16 to 60. Where the Provincial legislative council the seat was not uniform.
It retained the official majority of the central legislative council to have a non-official majority. Its the first time allowed Indians with executive councils of the Viceroys.
Satyendra Prasad Sinha is the first Indian to join the Viceroy’s executive council. Then Satyendra Prasad Sinha was appointed as the Law member.
It introduced the communal system of representation for Muslims. This Act legalized Communalism and Lord Minto came to be known as Father of Communal Electorate.
Minto-Morley reforms also gave a separate representation of the presidency, corporations, chambers of commerce, universities, and zamindars.
Government of India Act 1919
Also called as Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms.
Feature Government of India Act 1919
This act lightened the central control over the provinces. This is done by demarcating (எல்லை நிர்ணயம் செய்தல்) and separating the central and provincial subjects. The provincial and central legislatures were permitted to make laws on their respective subjects. But the structure of the government still stayed centralized and unitary.
This act further divided the provincial subject into two parts they are transferred and reserved subjects. Transferred subject – This subject is administered by a governor and with aid of ministers who are responsible to the legislative council. Reserved Subject – This subject is administered by the governor and his executive council without being answerable to the legislative council. This dual system of governance is known as Dyarchy. This system first time introduced bicameralism and also direct elections in India.
By Bicameralism, the Indian Legislative Council was replaced by a bicameral legislature with Upper and lower houses, where the majority of its members were selected through direct elections.
Out of 6 members of the Viceroy executive council, three were to be Indians, other than the commander in chief.
It extended communal representation by providing separate electorates for Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo Indians, and Europeans.
Voting rights (Franchise) were given to a limited number of people on the basis of property, tax, or education.
A new office called as High Commissioner for India is created in London. Some functions of the Secretary of state for India were transferred to him.
These acts provided the establishment of a Public service commission by that central public service commission was established in 1926.
For the first time, it separated the provincial budget from the central budget and also authorized the provincial legislature to enact a budget.
Government of India Act 1935
This act was detailed and has 321 Sections and 10 schedules.
Features of Government of India Act 1935
It provided the establishment of the All India Federation consisting of provinces and princely states as units.
The powers were divided between the Centre and the states called as Federal list, Provincial list, and concurrent list.
Viceroy is given Residuary powers. But the federation did not happen.
Provincial autonomy was established in place of the Dyarchy. The Act introduced responsible Government in the provinces by that the governor was required to act with the advice of ministers who are responsible to the provincial legislature. This came into effect in 1937 and it was discontinued in 1939.
It introduced bicameralism in six out of eleven provinces. Thus legislatures of Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and United Provinces were made bicameral consisting of a legislative council (upper house) and a legislative assembly (upper house).
This act provided communal representation by giving separate electorates for SC, women, and workers/labourers.
This act established the council of India which was established by the Government of India Act of 1858.
It extended the voting rights and about 10% of the total population got the voting right. This act established the Reserve Bank of India.
This act established the Federal Court in 1937.
This act provided for the establishment of not only a federal public service commission but also a provincial public service commission and joint public service commission for two or more provinces.
Indian Independence Act of 1947
On 20th February 1947, British Prime Minister Clement Atlee declared that British Rule in India will come to end by 30 June 1948. On 3 June 1947, Lord Mountbatten put a Partition plan known as Mountbatten Plan. Mountbatten’s plan was accepted by Congress and the Muslim league.
The feature of the Indian Independence Act of 1947
India declare Independence and Sovereign state on August 15, 1947. It provided a partition of India.
It abolished the office of the Viceroy and provided, a governor-general for each dominion.
“His majesty” government in Britain has no responsibility to India and Pakistan.
It gave power to the constituent assemblies of two dominions to frame their own constitution and abolish any act of the British Parliament, including the Independence Act itself.
It empowered the constituent assemblies of both dominions to frame legislation for their territories till the new constitutions were drafted and enforced.
It granted freedom to Indian princely states either to join Pakistan or India or to remain independent.
The member of the Constituent Assembly drafted the Indian Constitution. On 9 December 1946, the constituent Assembly first met.
The constituent assembly reassembled after the partition of Pakistan for the remaining part on 14th August 1947.
The members of the Constituent Assembly were elected indirectly by the members of the Provincial Legislative Assemblies.
The constituent Assembly was made of members suggested by the Committee of the British Cabinet also known as the Cabinet Mission.
Member of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly of India
The Role of Provinces and the Princely States
Seats were allotted to the Provinces and the Princely States based on the proportion to their population roughly in the ratio of 1:1 Million.
The Provinces were to elect 292 members while the princely states were to elect a minimum of 93 seats.
The number of seats in the provinces was divided between the three major religions such as Hindu, Muslim and Sikh with respect to their proportion to their population.
The member of each community in the Provisional Legislative Assembly elected their members by Proportional representation with a single transferable vote.
The method of selection of representatives of Princely states was to be determined by the princely states themselves.
Composition of the constituent assembly
284 members were present on 26th November 1949 and added their signatures to the constitution which finally passed.
The first meeting of the Constituent Assembly took place in New Delhi at the Constitution Hall on 9th December 1946.
Dr Sachchidananda Sinha took Chair as a Temporary Chairman.
The final meeting of the Constituent Assembly took place on 24th January 1950, with the “Signing of the Constitution” and Dr Rajendra Prasad is the Chairman of the Debate.
The Constituent Assembly debate consists of 12 Volumes. The Constituent Assembly was held between 9th December 1946 to 24th January 1950.
North-East Frontier Tribal Areas and Assam Excluded & Partially Excluded Areas Sub-Committee – Gopinath Bordoloi
Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas (Apart from those in Assam) Sub-Committee – A V Thakkar
Rules of Procedure Committee – Rajendra Prasad
States Committee (Committee for negotiating with states) – Jawaharlal Nehru
Steering Committee – Rajendra Prasad
National Flag and HOC Committee – Rajendra Prasad
Committee for the function of the Constitution Assembly – G V Mavlankar
House Committee – B Pattabhi Sitaramayya
Language Committee – Moturi Satyanarayana
Order of Business Committee – K M Munshi
* * All the Notes in this blog, are referred from Tamil Nadu State Board Books and Samacheer Kalvi Books. Kindly check with the original Tamil Nadu state board books and Ncert Books.